USPTO serial 85890006
SII
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SII?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J Maier
CHRISTOPHER J MAIER MAIER & MAIER PLLC345 S PATRICK STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financing and loan services, namely, arranging of loans, financial guarantees, equity capital investments, and providing lines of credit to local financial intermediaries for the economic development of Latin American and Caribbean countries; local and regional investment services, namely, providing loans to small and medium size companies in Latin American and Caribbean countries | ACTIVE | Aug 18, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |