USPTO serial 85891291
AFFDEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- I, DAVID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AFFDEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gwenn Roos
GWENN ROOS LAW OFFICE OF GWENN ROOS26 BROOKDALE AVEWELLESLEY, MA 02482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Apparatus for clinical diagnosis; electromagnetic medical diagnostic imaging apparatus; medical and dental apparatus for dimensional measurement, namely, 3D scanner for human body; medical apparatus and instruments relating to neurovegetative reactivity; medical device used for the acquisition of physiological data for polysomnography; medical image processors; medical imaging apparatus in the field of iridology, sclerology, rayid and eyology; medical imaging apparatus incorporating medical imaging software; medical instruments for recording heart activity; medical instruments for use in measuring, monitoring and evaluating facial expressions and responses for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes; medical products, namely, biofeedback sensors; portable medical devices with sensors to monitor the physical movements of a patient wearing or carrying the device; sensory testing instruments, namely, aesthesiometers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 26, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |