Drawing for LIFE EVOLUTION SYSTEM

USPTO serial 85895844

LIFE EVOLUTION SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LIFE EVOLUTION SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Curt Handley

CURT HANDLEY LAW OFFICE OF CURT HANDLEY19540 BUCKINGHAM DRSTE 1MOKENA, IL 60448-2432

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Personal fitness training services and consultancy; Personal training provided in connection with weight loss and exercise programs; Production and distribution of videos in the field of fitness and weight loss; Providing a website featuring information on exercise and fitnessACTIVEApr 1, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2014CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2014SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 22, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 29, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 29, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 5, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 10, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 21, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 22, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 17, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance