USPTO serial 85896611
CRITALFA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ANDREW T
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRITALFA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Adams
ROBERT W. ADAMS NIXON & VANDERHYE, P.C.901 N GLEBE RD FL 11ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, recombinant-erythropoietin for stimulating red blood cell production used to treat anemia | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2013 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |