CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BUSSEFLEX

USPTO serial 85898790

BUSSEFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUSSEFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. McConnell

ANDREW S. MCCONNELL BOYLE FREDRICKSON, S.C.840 N PLANKINTON AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53203-1802UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, CONVEYORS, PALLETIZERS, DEPALLETIZERS FOR CONTAINERS; COMBINATION PALLETIZER/DEPALLETIZERS; DEPALLETIZER SORTERS; CONTAINER FILING MACHINES, NAMELY, SINGLE FILERS; MASS FLOW CONVEYORS; PALLET CONVEYORS; PALLET STACKERS, PALLET DISPENSERS, RETORT CRATE LOADERS AND UNLOADERS; AIR CONVEYORS; AND HYDRAULIC AND PNEUMATIC CONTROLS AND CONTROL SOFTWARE FOR SUCH MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEMS SOLD AS A UNITACTIVE—
009MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, ACCUMULATORS FOR CONTAINERSACTIVE—
011IN-LINE CONTAINER WARMERS AND COOLERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 12, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 12, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 9, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 9, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 8, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance