USPTO serial 85898794
VEGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VEGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandy Lipkin
SANDY LIPKIN LAW OFFICES OF SANDY LIPKINPO BOX 3518VENTURA, CA 93006-3518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Ammonium chloride fertilizer; Ammonium nitrate fertilizer; Ammonium sulphate fertilizer; Blood powder; Bone meal; Brewers' grain; Calcined potassium fertilizer; Calcium silicate fertilizer; Calcium superphosphate fertilizer; Chemical fertilizers; Chemically converted compound fertilizers; Complex fertilizer; Complex fertilizers; Compost; Double or triple superphosphate fertilizer; Fertilizers; Fertilizers and manures; Fertilizers for agricultural use; Fertilizers for domestic use; Fertilizing preparations; Gypsum for use as a fertilizer; Leaf mold; Manganese fertilizer; Marine fertilizer; Mixed fertilizers; Natural fertilizers; Non-chemical bio-fertilizers; Nutritive additive to enhance the biological activity of water, soil, seeds and plants for purposes of fertilization and bioremediation of pollutants; Peat; Potassium chloride fertilizer; Potassium sulphate fertilizer; Rice bran; Sodium nitrate fertilizer; Thomas phosphatic fertilizer; Urea fertilizer; planting soil | ACTIVE | Feb 12, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |