USPTO serial 85900655
OUTPACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OUTPACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James F. Monagle
88 KEARNY ST FL 10SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108-5524UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Physical media computer software for performing and analyzing customized operational functions, namely, sales, marketing, and supply chain management; downloadable cloud computer software for performing and analyzing customized operational functions, namely, sales, marketing, and supply chain management; downloadable computer software for performing and analyzing customized operational functions, namely, sales, marketing, and supply chain management; computer application software for mobile phones and handheld computers for performing and analyzing customized operational functions, namely, sales, marketing, and supply chain management; all of the abovementioned goods exclude stand-alone software for enabling infrastructure as a service (IaaS) and platform as a service (PaaS) | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Strategic business consulting services; operational business consulting services; information-technology related business consulting services; all of the abovementioned services exclude stand-alone services for enabling infrastructure as a service (IaaS) and platform as a service (PaaS) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software design services for businesses; software development services for businesses; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable cloud computer software for performing and analyzing customized operational functions, namely, sales, marketing, and supply chain management; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for performing and analyzing customized operational functions, namely, sales, marketing, and supply chain management; all of the abovementioned services exclude stand-alone services and software for enabling infrastructure as a service (IaaS) and platform as a service (PaaS) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OUTPACE SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OUTPACE SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OUTPACE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |