USPTO serial 85900659
T-MAXX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with T-MAXX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Diamond Creek VIC 3089, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerry K. Mueller, Jr.
JERRY K. MUELLER, JR. MUELLER LAW, LLC86 VILLAGE POINTE DRPOWELL, OH 43065-7760UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Air pumps for bicycles for the inflation of tyres; Air pumps for inflating bicycle tyres; Air pumps for vehicle tyres; Automobile tires; Bicycle tires; Casings for pneumatic tires; Covers for tyres; Cycle tires; Flanges for railway wheel tires; Foot pumps for inflating vehicle tyres; Hand pumps for inflating vehicle tyres; Inner tubes for pneumatic tires; Inner tubes for pneumatic tyres; Inner tubes for tyres; Metal anti-skid studs for vehicle tyres; Non-skid studs for vehicle tyres; Non-skid chains for vehicle tires; Patches for inner tubes of tyres; Patches for tyres; Repair patches for inner tubes for tyres; Repair patches for tyres; Pneumatic tires; Pneumatic tyres for vehicle wheels; Pumps for inflating bicycle tyres; Pumps for inflating pneumatic tyres; Pumps for inflating vehicle tyres; Puncture repair kits for bicycle tyres comprising patches; Remoulded tyres; Repair materials for tyres, namely patches; Repair kits for inner tubes for tyres comprising patches; Repair kits for tyres comprising patches; Repairing materials of rubber for repairing tyres, namely, patches; Retreaded tyres; Rubber patches for repairing vehicle tyres; Rubber tread patterns for use in retreading recycled tyres; Rubber tread patterns for use in retreading tyres; Rubber tread patterns for use in retreading vehicle tyres; Solid rubber tyres for vehicle wheels; Spokes for bicycle tires; Anti-skid studs for tires; Treads for retreading tires; Tubeless tires for bicycles, cycles; Tubeless tyres for bicycles; Tyres for agricultural vehicles; Tyres for aircraft; Tyres for automobiles; Tyres for bicycles; Tyres for buses; Tyres for commercial vehicles; Tyres for trucks; Tyres for wheelchairs; Tyres, solid, for automobile wheels; Valves for automobile tyres; automobile tyres; automobile wheel tires | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |