USPTO serial 85901912
FPI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5144095Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 21, 2017
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FPI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, CA
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, CA
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gina L. Durham
GINA L. DURHAM DLA PIPER LLP (US)PO BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software for use in the production of wood and paper pulp and of engineered wood products; software for use in identifying and analyzing contaminants, brightness and whiteness in paper pulp and recycled paper; software for data acquisition, data organizing, data transfer and for creating reports concerning the productivity, production and operation of forestry equipment, and wood pulp and paper production machinery; software for integrating data, analyzing data and creating reports and performance indicators relating to forestry operations, the operation of wood pulp and paper production machinery; software used to model, simulate and plan forestry operations using georeferenced base data in conjunction with cost and productivity models; software for optimization of forestry operations, namely, for harvesting, logistics and transportation planning; software for planning, scheduling, monitoring of forestry supply chain operations and generating key performance indicators; software for use in the bio conversion process of cellulose, all of the foregoing recorded on media or downloadable from the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | research, development and testing services in the field of forestry, wood products manufacturing, pulp and paper, chemicals, bio energy, bio materials, packaging, transportation and building systems; designing and developing production machinery, equipment, processes and software for the forestry, wood products, pulp and paper, chemical, bio energy, bio materials, packaging and transportation industries; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in the production of wood and paper pulp and of engineered wood products; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in identifying and analyzing contaminants, brightness and whiteness in paper pulp and recycled paper; providing on-line non-downloadable software for data acquisition, data organizing, data transfer and for creating reports concerning the productivity, production and operation of forestry equipment, and wood pulp and paper production machinery; providing on-line non-downloadable software for integrating data, analyzing data and creating reports and performance indicators relating to forestry operations, the operation of wood pulp and paper production machinery; providing on-line non-downloadable software used to model, simulate and plan forestry operations using georeferenced base data in conjunction with cost and productivity models; providing on-line non-downloadable software for optimization of forestry operations, namely, for harvesting, logistics and transportation planning; providing on-line non-downloadable software for planning, scheduling, monitoring of forestry supply chain operations and generating key performance indicators; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in the bio conversion process of cellulose | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |