USPTO serial 85903860
INK MONSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INK MONSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Fischer
MARK A FISCHER DUANE MORRIS LLP100 HIGH STREET SUITE 2400BOSTON, MA 02110-1724UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | publishing of books and e-books | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2014 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |