Drawing for SARDAR

USPTO serial 85906095

SARDAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SARDAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen R. BURRI

STEPHEN R. BURRI ISLAND IP LAW43 MACHLEARY STREETNANAIMO, BC, V9R2G3CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable computer software, namely, business enterprise software to allow users to perform a variety of business functions including scheduling, ordering of supplies, payroll, accounting, staff productivity monitoring, worksite productivity monitoring, safety monitoring, tracking, receiving, invoicing capability, tracking business metrics, providing customers access to project reporting in real time, contact management, maintenance tracking and scheduling, inventory tracking and control, and generating production reports; downloadable computer software for use in database management; downloadable computer software for use as a spreadsheet; downloadable computer software, namely, factory automation software for integrating manufacturing machine operations, tracking problems and generating production reportACTIVE—
035database managementACTIVE—
042providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software, namely, business enterprise software to allow users to perform a variety of business functions including scheduling, ordering of supplies, payroll, accounting, staff productivity monitoring, worksite productivity monitoring, safety monitoring, tracking, receiving, invoicing capability, tracking business metrics, providing customers access to project reporting in real time, contact management, maintenance tracking and scheduling, inventory tracking and control, and generating production reports; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for use in database management; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for use as a spreadsheet; computer software, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable factory automation software for integrating manufacturing machine operations, tracking problems and generating production reports; database management; providing temporary use of non-downloadable customized business enterprise software for use in database management in the field of business administration; consulting, namely, computer software consulting; design, namely, computer software design; rental of database servers to third parties and computer software rental in the field of business administrationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 1, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 28, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 27, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 24, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 8, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 7, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 31, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 31, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 31, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance