USPTO serial 85907789
DINGTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DINGTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay F. Moldovanyi
JAY F. MOLDOVANYI FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVE FL 5CLEVELAND, OH 44115-1834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | earphones; wireless headsets; headphones; speakers; portable media player; mobile phones; tablet computers; digital cameras | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |