Drawing for WONDERFALL

USPTO serial 85908460

WONDERFALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WONDERFALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edgar A. Zarins

EDGAR A ZARINS MASCO CORPORATION21001 VAN BORN RDTAYLOR, MI 48180-1300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011PLUMBING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHOWERHEADSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 2, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 2, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 27, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 19, 2016EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 18, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 18, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 9, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 9, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 13, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 4, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2014CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 7, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 16, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 10, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2013CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 27, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 27, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance