USPTO serial 85908499
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jon P. Deppe
JON P. DEPPE MARSH FISCHMANN & BREYFOGLE LLP8055 E TUFTS AVE STE 450DENVER, CO 80237-2837UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric apparatus for commutation, namely, electric circuits and electric transformers; Scientific, photographic, cinematographic, measuring, signalling apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic monitors and monitor modules for monitoring electric current and electrical signals; Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity; Apparatus for recording, transmission, and reproduction of sound, images, and data; Apparatus for storing and organizing sound, images, videos, and data, namely, blank tapes, electronic memory media, and blank electronic storage media for storage of computer data; Apparatus for recording transmission and reproduction of videos, namely, digital video recorders and personal video playback apparatuses; Blank magnetic data carriers, blank recording discs; Pre-recorded magnetic data carriers and recording discs featuring music rhythms, pulses, sounds, and electrical signal characteristics; Automatic, data processing equipment and computers; Apparatus for making sounds and rhythms, namely, electronic rhythm machines in the nature of headphones, headsets and earphones that are able to produce rhythmic electronic signals; Apparatus for connecting a plurality of headphones to audio reproduction apparatus, namely, connection cables and wireless connection means in the nature of apparatus for wireless transmission of acoustic information; Computer hardware and computer software programs for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures into an interactive delivery for multimedia applications; Computer hardware for upload, storage, retrieval, download, transmission and delivery of digital content; Computer programs for editing images, sound, and video; Computer software for interpretation of neuro and brain scans provided by diagnostic imaging equipment; Downloadable scientific and medical data via the internet; Electronic products for the generation, measurement, and analysis of audio signals, namely, audio analyzers; Electronic products for the manipulation of the frequency, time, and amplitude characteristics of audio signals, namely, audio processors; Integrated circuits and integrated circuit cores for use in wireless communications and wireless communication equipment and apparatus and digital signal processors (DSP); Personal headphones for sound transmitting apparatuses, namely, headsets, headphones, and earphones; Personal headphones for use with sound transmitting systems, namely, headsets, headphones, and earphones; Portable and handheld digital electronic devices for recording, organizing, transmitting, manipulating, and reviewing text, data, image, and audio files; Transmitters and receivers for audio and video signals for transmission over twisted pair cables; Transmitters of electronic signals; Acoustic coupling apparatus for use with the ear in the nature of headsets, headphones, and earplugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 015 | Apparatus for making sounds and rhythms, namely, musical instruments in the nature of rhythm machines | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 11, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 11, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 3, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |