USPTO serial 85909379
GREENCOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREENCOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
L-1718 Luxembourg, LU
L-1718 Luxembourg, LU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Boris Umansky and Daniel Gurfinkel
BORIS UMANSKY AND DANIEL GURFINKEL DENNEMEYER & ASSOCIATES LLC120 S LASALLE STSUITE 1400CHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Bases for bakery goods; bases for making desserts, namely, cake mixes; vinegar; pasta; frozen desserts, namely, ice cream, frozen custard, ice milk, and sherbet; frozen confectionery; fruit crisp dessert mixes; bread mixes; dessert mousse; confectionery made of sugar; edible food flavoured alganic pearls filled with food flavored liquid for the use in cooking as seasoning accessory to dishes and desserts | ABANDONED | — |
| 043 | Providing of food and drink; catering services; food preparation services; food distribution services in the nature of providing food and drink to others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |