Drawing for AIF

USPTO serial 85909876

AIF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AIF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

PATRICK J. JENNINGS PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP1200 Seventeenth Street, NWWashington, DC 20036-3006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing transmission of messages among computer users concerning institutional investment policyACTIVENov 7, 2007
041Educational services, namely, conducting conferences in the field of institutional investment policyACTIVENov 7, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 29, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 2, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 13, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 11, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 11, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 11, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 10, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 5, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 5, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 5, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 5, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 27, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Apr 26, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 23, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance