Drawing for MONSTER 500

USPTO serial 85909910

MONSTER 500

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDSON, JENNIFER D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONSTER 500?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacqueline Zion

JACQUELINE ZION PEARL COHEN ZEDEK LATZER LLP1500 BROADWAY FL 12NEW YORK, NY 10036-4068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, creating an online community for registered users to participate in discussions, get feedback from peers and engage in social networking; design of branded toys, games and playthings, computer software, computer games, stationery, clothing, and household items; application service provider (ASP) featuring software to enable uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information over the Internet or other communications network; computer services, namely, hosting online web facilities for others for organizing and conducting online meetings, gatherings, and interactive discussions; computer services in the nature of the design and hosting of customized web pages featuring user-defined information, personal profiles and information; providing information at the specific request of end-users by means of telephone or global computer networks, namely, providing customized computer searching services, namely, searching and retrieving information at the customer's specific request via the internet; computer services, namely, hosting customized web pages featuring user-defined information, personal profiles and information; computer software design and development; computer game design and development; upgrading and maintenance of computer software; providing temporary use of web-based non-downloadable software applications for social networking, creating a virtual community, and transmission of audio, video, photographic images, text, graphics and data; rental of computer software and games software; software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in database management and for use in the field of on-line entertainment, namely, playing on-line interactive games; computer support services, namely, computer technology support services in the nature of help desk services; online gaming support services, namely, providing technical support services for users of online computer game software in the nature of troubleshooting of computer game software problems; online gaming software technical support services, namely, 24/7 service desk or help desk services for it infrastructure, operating systems, database systems, and web applications; design and development of computer hardware and gaming equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 2016TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Aug 29, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 26, 2016OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 14, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 12, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 6, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 28, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 16, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 18, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 9, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance