USPTO serial 85910081
WHEN, WHY & HOW TO ASK FOR MONEY: A DONOR-CENTERED DIALOGUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHEN, WHY & HOW TO ASK FOR MONEY: A DONOR-CENTERED DIALOGUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed seminar notes | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting business seminars in the field of Nonprofit Management; Conducting workshops and seminars in When, Why and How to Ask for Money: A Donor-Centered Dialogue; Continuing education services, namely, providing live and on-line continuing professional education seminars in the field of Nonprofit Management; Education services, namely, providing career re-training seminars, classes and workshops in the fields of Nonprofit Management; Education services, namely, providing live and on-line seminars, classes and workshops in the field of Nonprofit Management; Education services, namely, providing on-line seminars, classes and workshops in the field of Nonprofit Management; Education services, namely, providing seminars, classes and workshops in the field of Nonprofit Management; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, classes and workshops in the fields of Nonprofit Management and distribution of training materials in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, classes and workshops in the field of Nonprofit Management; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, classes and workshops in the field of Nonprofit Management and distribution of training material in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, classes and workshops in the field of Nonprofit Management; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, classes and workshops in the field of Nonprofit Management and distribution of course material in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, classes and workshops in the field of Nonprofit Management and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, providing on-line seminars, classes and workshops in the field of Nonprofit Management; Providing on-line training seminars, classes and workshops in the field of Nonprofit Management | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mueller, Carlyn, M.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WHEN, WHY & HOW TO ASK FOR MONEY: A DONOR-CENTERED DIALOGUE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |