Drawing for NUTRI-SIGHT

USPTO serial 85910534

NUTRI-SIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUTRI-SIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kris Kappel

KRIS KAPPEL HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP4801 MAIN STSTE 1000KANSAS CITY, MO 64112-2551

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Vitamins and nutritional supplementsACTIVE—
035Online retail store services featuring vitamins and supplements; retail store services featuring vitamins and supplementsACTIVE—
039Distribution services, namely, delivery of vitamins and nutritional supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 13, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 21, 2015GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2015GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 18, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 27, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 27, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 26, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 26, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance