USPTO serial 85912045
BEAUTY XPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINER, MARK W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEAUTY XPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry B. Ward, III
HENRY B. WARD, III MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC100 N TRYON ST STE 4700CHARLOTTE, NC 28202-4003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, perfumery, essential oils, soaps, and dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training and further training of expert personnel in the wellness field, in particular in the cosmetics field, in the body and beauty care field and in the field of nutrition and nutritional consultancy; arranging and conducting of congresses, conferences, symposiums, seminars and colloquiums, in particular in the wellness and lifestyle sector, in the cosmetics sector, in the field of body and beauty care and in the field of nutritional consultancy; and demonstration training in the aforesaid fields in particular in the cosmetics field, in the body care field and in the field of nutrition and nutritional consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Lifestyle and wellness consultancy; pharmacy advice; health consultancy; nutrition consultation, nutritional consultancy; hygienic and beauty care; cosmetician services; operation of a cosmetics institute; and providing institute facilities in the wellness and spa sectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |