USPTO serial 85912051
Serial No. 85912051
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OLANDRIA, WARREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 85912051?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE L. GRENIER
MICHELLE L. GRENIER GRENIER LAW OFFICES, PC225 FRANKLIN ST FL 26BOSTON, MA 02110-2853UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Image and text-based diagnostic and medical reference software for use by medical professionals and patients; Computer application software for searching, viewing, uploading and comparative analysis of images for use in the medical field; computer application software for mobile phones and handheld devices for searching, viewing, uploading and comparative analysis of images for use in the medical field; downloadable electronic images for use in the medical field; computer software for use in image analysis for use in the medical field e that provides web-based access to applications and services through a web operating system or portal interface; Software, namely, software development tools for the creation of online and mobile applications and client interfaces; Computer software for providing and using digitized images in the medical field; Computer software for providing and using digitized images in the field of biosciences, namely, pathology, histology, histopathology, cytopathology, horticulture, biology, botany, pharmacology and veterinary; computer software for providing and using digitized images in the field of architecture and landscaping; Computer software for providing and using digitized images in the field of automobile design; Computer software for providing digital imaging services, in particular web-based digital imaging services; Computer application software for mobile phones and handheld devices for searching, viewing, uploading and comparative analysis of images for use in the field of biosciences, namely, pathology, histology, histopathology, cytopathology, horticulture, biology, botany, pharmacology and veterinary; Computer software for providing and using digitized images in the field of architecture and landscaping; Computer application software for mobile phones and handheld devices for searching, viewing, uploading and comparative analysis of images for use images in the field of architecture and landscaping; Computer application software for mobile phones and handheld devices for searching, viewing, uploading and comparative analysis of images for use in the field of automobile design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |