Drawing for RADIANT

USPTO serial 85912421

RADIANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RADIANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Hobbs

AUSTIN PADGETT TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5200BANK OF AMERICA PLAZAATLANTA, GA 30308-2216

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail electricity provider services that allow customers to purchase electricityACTIVE—
040Generation of electricity from solar energyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 26, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 26, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 23, 2014EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 10, 2014EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 6, 2014RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Sep 9, 2014GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 9, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 9, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 9, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 25, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 25, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 25, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 25, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 5, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance