Drawing for COCOABRAN

USPTO serial 85913062

COCOABRAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COCOABRAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claudia A. Smith

CLAUDIA A SMITH WHITE & CASE LLP1155 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2711UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Cocoa shells in powdered form; cocoa and cocoa-based goods containing cocoa shells in powdered form, namely, cocoa powder; compound chocolate, namely, compound chocolate coating for use in the manufacture of cakes and frozen confectionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 12, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 12, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 13, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 26, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 21, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 4, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 25, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 25, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 12, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 12, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 1, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance