USPTO serial 85913854
EAT CLEAN BE LEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EAT CLEAN BE LEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Anderfuren
Jill Anderfuren Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP550 West Adams StreetSuite 300Chicago, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | wheat-free and gluten free products, namely, nutritional bars, crackers, soups and pastas | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2011 |
| 044 | Providing on-line information, news and commentary in the field of health and wellness relating to healthy eating, nutrition and naturopathic medicine; Providing on-line information, news and commentary in the field of health and wellness relating to healthy eating, nutrition and naturopathic medicine | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2013 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |