USPTO serial 85914059
IMAGE IMMERSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OLANDRIA, WARREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMAGE IMMERSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Grenier, Esq.
MICHELLE L. GRENIER, ESQ. GRENIER LAW OFFICES, PC225 FRANKLIN ST FL 26BOSTON, MA 02110-2853UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for searching, viewing, uploading and comparative analysis of images for use in the medical field; Computer application software for mobile phones and handheld devices for searching, viewing, uploading and comparative analysis of images for use in the medical field; Downloadable electronic images for use in the medical field; Computer software for use in image analysis for use in the medical field; Computer software that provides web-based access to applications and services through a web operating system or portal interface; Software, namely, software development tools for the creation of online and mobile applications and client interfaces; Computer software for providing and using digitized images in the medical field; Computer software for providing and using digitized images in the field of biosciences, namely, pathology, histology, histopathology, cytopathology, horticulture, biology, botany, pharmacology and veterinary; computer software for providing and using digitized images in the field of architecture and landscaping; Computer software for providing and using digitized images in the field of automobile design; Computer software for providing digital imaging services, in particular web-based digital imaging services; Computer application software for mobile phones and handheld devices for searching, viewing, uploading and comparative analysis of images for use in the field of biosciences, namely, pathology, histology, histopathology, cytopathology, horticulture, biology, botany, pharmacology and veterinary; Computer software for providing and using digitized images in the field of architecture and landscaping; Computer application software for mobile phones and handheld devices for searching, viewing, uploading and comparative analysis of images for use images in the field of architecture and landscaping; Computer application software for mobile phones and handheld devices for searching, viewing, uploading and comparative analysis of images for use in the field of automobile design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |