Drawing for EGIMOTORS

USPTO serial 85914560

EGIMOTORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EGIMOTORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James J. Jagoda

JAMES J. JAGODA UNGARETTI & HARRIS LLP70 W MADISON ST STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60602-4283UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Motor and engines except for land vehicles; Motors other than for land vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2015PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 7, 2015APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 12, 2014PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2014FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 15, 2014MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
May 15, 2014ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Apr 23, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 23, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance