Drawing for M.C. RAISINS

USPTO serial 85915214

M.C. RAISINS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M.C. RAISINS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason R. Lee

Jason R. Lee Amazing Fruit Products Ltd155 Gordon Baker RdSuite 215Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3N5

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Raisins; Snack mix consisting of wasabi peas, processed nuts, dehydrated fruit and/or raisins; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisinsACTIVE—
030Chocolate covered raisins; Sweetened yogurt covered raisinsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 21, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 7, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2014RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Apr 23, 2014RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2014RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 3, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance