USPTO serial 85915576
ALGATEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GALAN, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALGATEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | The overall objective of the AlgaTEST is to provide an effective algaecide treatment recommendation for a water resource containing algae. Field samples are received for laboratory evaluation. The AlgaTEST evaluates the algae at a specific site in terms of density, biomass, classification, chlorophyll content and physical characteristics (i.e. colonial, filamentous, mat-forming, planktonic). The AlgaTEST also measures water quality parameters for a site (i.e. pH, alkalinity, hardness, conductivity, DO, turbidity). Laboratory algaecide treatments are selected based on 1) the type of algae, 2) water quality parameters, 3) water resource characteristics (i.e. flow, surface area, depth), 4) water resource uses (fishing, irrigation, recreation, cooling water, discharge), 5) previous treatment history and 6) any product regulatory restrictions. The specific site algae in the site water are used in the algaecide treatment experiments. An array of algaecide treatments may be evaluated. A series of treatment rates are used to assess the concentration of algaecide(s) that should be applied to decrease application of excessive product amounts. Measured responses of the algae to evaluate treatment efficacy may include: cell densities, biomass, chlorophyll content, carotenoid content, phycobilin content, cell viability, ATP production, carbon fixation, and ion uptake/release. Visual and statistical comparison of different algaecide treatments and rates are used to determine a field site application recommendation. By measuring the sensitivity of the specific algae at a site, an effective algaecide treatment and rate can be selected and subsequently decrease selection of a less effective product or use of excessive product amounts. This in turn will save time invested on a project, decrease overall algaecide cost, decrease chemical residues, and have a lower potential for non-target species risks with an application | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |