Drawing for HABESHA PRIDE AND EXCELLENCE 2004

USPTO serial 85916307

HABESHA PRIDE AND EXCELLENCE 2004

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HABESHA PRIDE AND EXCELLENCE 2004?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson

JENNIFER SHEEHAN ANDERSON HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN LLP39400 WOODWARD AVE STE 101BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, non-alcoholic beer, non-alcoholic carbonated beverages, non-alcoholic fruit based beverages, non-alcoholic cocktailsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 29, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 29, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 1, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 13, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 3, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance