USPTO serial 85917143
TURQUOISE GAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TURQUOISE GAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPVENABLE P.O. Box 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Board games, puzzles, toys, books; video games, mobile applications for smart phones and tablets | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Sales and distribution of board games, puzzles, toys, books; sales and distribution of video games, mobile applications for smart phones and tablets; Providing online computer games over global and local area computer; providing information relating to video games and video games related products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Filosofia Éditions Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by JEUX PLAN B INC. / PLAN B GAMES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PLAN B ÉDITEUR INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named TURQUOISE GAMES
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |