Drawing for BLUEJAZZ

USPTO serial 85917383

BLUEJAZZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4589674Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2014
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BLUEJAZZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justina Buckles

Justina Buckles Cprime, Inc.8000 Regency Pkwy, Suite 675Cary, NC 27518UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing a web site that features informal instruction on software development lifecycle, software engineering, business management, compliance, namely, regulation compliance, best practices, namely, formulation of best practices for scaling Agile software development methods to the enterprise level, namely, applying Lean manufacturing best practices to the software development lifecycle, namely, formulation of best practices for continuous software delivery, namely, best practices for automation of IT operations to reduce cycle time from concept to cash in the field of business and SLDC, namely, software development lifecycle, ALM, namely, application lifecycle management, CLM, namely, collaborative lifecycle management toolsetsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 1, 2012
042Computer services, namely, hosting and maintaining an on-line web site for others for training, software development lifecycle management, and business process management; Computer services, namely, providing an interactive web site featuring technology that allows users to collect, store, manage, deliver and showcase electronic and paper-based content; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to manage and collaborate on software engineering, software development lifecycle methods and processes, business processes, best practices, namely, formulation of best practices for scaling Agile software development methods to the enterprise level, namely, applying Lean manufacturing best practices to the software development lifecycle, namely, formulation of best practices for continuous software delivery, namely, best practices for automation of IT operations to reduce cycle time from concept to cash in the field of business, and SLDC, namely, software development lifecycle, ALM, namely, application lifecycle management, CLM, namely, collaborative lifecycle management toolsetsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 1, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2025CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 19, 2023REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2020NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2020C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 22, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 15, 2020E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2019REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 19, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 17, 2014SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2014CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 25, 2014SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 4, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 2, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2014INCSITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE—
May 22, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 29, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 29, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 4, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 3, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 2, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance