USPTO serial 85918078
UPGRADED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UPGRADED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. McLean, Esq.
Paul A. McLean, Esq. DLA Piper LLP (US)2000 University AvenueEast Palo Alto, CA 94303-2215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Artificial coffee and tea; Barley tea; Beverages made of coffee; Beverages made of tea; Beverages with a chocolate base; Beverages with a coffee base; Beverages with a tea base; Black tea; Caffeine-free coffee; Chai tea; Chicory and chicory mixtures, all for use as substitutes for coffee; Chicory based coffee substitute; Chocolate; Chocolate and chocolates; Chocolate bark containing ground coffee beans; Chocolate bars; Chocolate candies; Chocolate chips; Chocolate confections; Chocolate covered cocoa nibs; Chocolate covered cookies; Chocolate covered fruit; Chocolate covered nuts; Chocolate covered raisins; Chocolate covered roasted coffee beans; Chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; Chocolate for toppings; Chocolate mousse; Chocolate pastes; Chocolate powder; Chocolate sauce; Chocolate syrup; Chocolate topping; Chocolate truffles; Chocolate-based beverages; Chocolate-based beverages with milk; Chocolate-based meal replacement bars; Chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; Chocolate-based spread also containing nuts; Chocolates and chocolate based ready to eat candies and snacks; Chocolates containing nutrients; Citron tea; Cocoa beverages with milk; Coffee; Coffee and artificial coffee; Coffee and coffee substitutes; Coffee and tea; Coffee based beverages; Coffee beans; Coffee beverages with milk; Coffee capsules containing coffee for brewing; Coffee essences; Coffee essences for use as substitutes for coffee; Coffee extracts; Coffee extracts for use as substitutes for coffee; Coffee pods; Coffee substitutes; Coffee substitutes; Coffee-based beverage containing milk; Coffee-based beverages; Coffee-based iced beverages; Confectioneries, namely, snack foods, namely, chocolate; Filled chocolate; Fresh fruits cut into flower shapes and at least partially coated with chocolate; Fruit teas; Ginger tea; Ginseng tea; Green coffee; Green tea; Ground coffee beans; Herb tea; Herbal tea; Hot chocolate; Ice milk; Ice milk bars; Iced coffee; Iced tea; Instant coffee; Instant tea; Japanese green tea; Lime tea; Milk chocolate; Mixes in the nature of concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of tea based beverages; Mixtures of coffee and chicory; Oolong tea; Prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages; Roasted coffee beans; Rooibos tea; Sage tea; Snack foods, namely, chocolate-based snack foods; Sugar-coated coffee beans; Syrups for making tea; Tea; Tea bags; Tea extracts; Tea for infusions; Tea of parched powder of barley with husk (mugi-cha); Tea of salty kelp powder (kombu-cha); Tea pods; Tea substitutes; Tea-based beverages; Tea-based iced beverages; Theine-free tea sweetened with sweeteners; Unroasted coffee; White lotus tea (Baengnyeoncha) | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |