USPTO serial 85918294
SHOWTOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHOWTOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Leventhal
MICHAEL LEVENTHAL MC SQUARED, THE LAW FIRM11700 NATIONAL BLVD STE L106LOS ANGELES, CA 90064-3669UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software application that allows users to share, via social networks and other means, for the purposes of entertainment and other uses, images from and links to specific locations in a video being delivered via the web and mobile sites/applications; software application that allows website owners to integrate the application, via a Software Developer Kit (SDK) or custom integration, into web and mobile sites and apps, adding the application functionality to video content that is under their control; software application that allows consumers to interact with the application via user interface elements integrated into a video player and/or via other user interface elements such as buttons on a web page or mobile application that are linked to a video, or a "bookmarklet" or "plugin" installed in a web browser | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Computer services, namely providing a software application that allows users to share, via social networks and other means, for the purposes of entertainment and other uses, images from and links to specific locations in a video being delivered via the web and mobile sites/applications; computer services, namely providing a software application that allows website owners to integrate the application, via a Software Developer Kit (SDK) or custom integration, into web and mobile sites and apps, adding the application functionality to video content that is under their control; computer services, namely providing a software application that allows consumers to interact with the application via user interface elements integrated into a video player and/or via other user interface elements such as buttons on a web page or mobile application that are linked to a video, or a "bookmarklet" or "plugin" installed in a web browser | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |