Drawing for PURE PUDDING

USPTO serial 85918417

PURE PUDDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURE PUDDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Warren A. Sklar

WARREN A. SKLAR RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR1621 EUCLID AVE FL 19CLEVELAND, OH 44115-2193UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fruit-based snack food; Vegetable-based snack foodsACTIVE—
030Dessert puddings; PuddingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 28, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 27, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 3, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance