USPTO serial 85918739
DAILY GREENS TO GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAILY GREENS TO GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott A. Gronek
SCOTT A. GRONEK ASSIST-2-SELL, INC.1610 MEADOW WOOD LNRENO, NV 89502-6603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Providing of food and drink via a mobile truck | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2016 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |