Drawing for CMS4SCHOOLS

USPTO serial 85919229

CMS4SCHOOLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CMS4SCHOOLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph S. Heino

JOSEPH S HEINO DAVIS & KUELTHAU SC111 E KILBOURN AVESTE 1400MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-6613

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software that provides web-based access to applications and services through a web operating system or portal interfaceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 6, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 6, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 18, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 23, 2015GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2015GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 18, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 28, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 28, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 28, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 28, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 7, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 3, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance