USPTO serial 85919385
CANADA 2015
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANADA 2015?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
JAMES R MENKER HOLLEY & MENKER, PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233-1715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, tops and bottoms; footwear; headgear, namely, headwear, headbands and beanies; shirts; knit shirts; jerseys, pullovers, tank tops; T-shirts; singlets; dresses; skirts; underwear; swimwear, bikinis; shorts; pants; sweaters; bonnets; caps; hats; scarves; headscarves; shawls; visors; warm-up suits; sweatshirts; jackets; sports jackets; stadium jackets; blazers; rainwear; coats; uniforms; ties; wristbands; headbands; gloves; aprons; bibs not of paper; pyjamas; toddler and infant playwear, namely, infantwear and toddler and infant one piece clothing; socks and hosiery; suspenders; belts; braces; sandals, thong sandals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA)
- Other trademarks owned by Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA)
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named CANADA 2015
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |