USPTO serial 85919484
DFUZE360
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DFUZE360?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Martensen
MICHAEL C. MARTENSEN MARTENSEN IP30 E KIOWA ST STE 101COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903-1510UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | compilation of information into computer databases in the field of public safety for technology research | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, digital network telecommunications services and telecommunication access services; providing access to databases; providing access to a computer database; providing access to Internet databases; computer aided transmission of messages and images; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; providing user access to global computer networks; information, advisory and consulting services relating to the aforesaid services; all of the aforesaid services being in the fields of public safety intelligence analysis and public safety and provided for law enforcement and intelligence agencies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design services relating to analysis of intelligence and public safety information, namely, scientific research and development for developing public safety information review and analysis strategies; industrial analysis and research services, namely, research and development of computer software for use in the field of public safety; Industrial research in the field of public safety; design and development of computer software; computer programing; computer consultancy services; computer software technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; technical consulting and advisory services related to computer software; computer software installation; maintenance and updating of computer software; providing computer software testing for others; all of the aforesaid services being in the fields of public safety intelligence analysis and public safety and provided for law enforcement and intelligence agencies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Software Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Software Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DFUZE360
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |