USPTO serial 85920101
HERBSAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HERBSAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard Natter
HOWARD NATTER NATTER & NATTER501 5TH AVE SUITE 808NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Containers for household use, namely, air-tight containers with a one-way valve for preserving dried herbs to retain freshness | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |