USPTO serial 85920112
THREE NOTCH'D BREWING COMPANY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THREE NOTCH'D BREWING COMPANY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Bergert
ROBERT C VAN ARNAM WILLIAMS MULLEN PC321 E MAIN STREETSUITE 400CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer | ABANDONED | Aug 29, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Three Notch'd Brewing Company, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Three Notch'd Brewing Company, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named THREE NOTCH'D BREWING COMPANY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |