Drawing for NETWORK OF HAIRCOLOR SPECIALISTS AND STYLISTS

USPTO serial 85921864

NETWORK OF HAIRCOLOR SPECIALISTS AND STYLISTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARKER, JUSTINE D
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NETWORK OF HAIRCOLOR SPECIALISTS AND STYLISTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad M. Behar

BRAD M. BEHAR BRAD M. BEHAR & ASSOCIATES, PLLC94 2ND STMINEOLA, NY 11501-3008UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for cellular and mobile phones, portable media players, and handheld computers, namely, computer application software for providing information about hairdressing and beauty, and hair care and stylingACTIVE—
038Providing an on-line forum with information about hairdressing and beauty, namely, communications platform via computer and telephone allowing access to services and hair care and styling and beauty information; Providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the beauty and hairdressing industries concerning the fields of beauty, hair care and hair stylingINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
041Training programs in the fields of techniques and trends relating to hair care, hairdressing and beauty; production and distribution of entertainment and educational television programs to cable, wireless cable, and satellite television systems featuring hair and beauty related subject matters; entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of hair; entertainment services in the nature of creation, development, and production of television programs related to hair and beauty; entertainment, namely, a hair show broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media; entertainment and educational services, namely, organization of exhibitions, competitions of beauty, conferences, seminars, performances, all in the fields of hair care, hair styling and beauty; online magazine in the field of hair care, hair styling and beauty; production and distribution services, namely, the production and distribution of videos and television and radio programs featuring information intended for consumers looking for assistance with hair care and styling product sand beautyINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
044Providing a website featuring information in the form of video and audio presentations in the field of hair care and styling, and personal grooming and beautyINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 25, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2014ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 27, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance