USPTO serial 85923403
FOCII
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOCII?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Oxford, Oxfordshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine M. Baker
CHRISTINE M. BAKER MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY & POPEO, PC666 3RD AVE FL 24NEW YORK, NY 10017-4040UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical goods, apparatus and instruments; eyewear; prescription eyewear; adjustable optical power eyewear; eyeglasses; prescription eyeglasses; adjustable optical power eyeglasses; eyeglass frames; eyeglass lenses; corrective lenses; adjustable optical power lenses; protective eyewear; eyeglasses adapted to protect the eyes; eyeglasses having filtering lenses; eyeglasses with partial vision occlusion; eye protection wear for sports; eyeglass shields; industrial and military safety eye protection articles; goggles for the protection of the eyes; masks for protection against toxic, noxious or harmful substances or materials; eyeglass cases, containers and holders; eyeglass chains, cords and retaining straps; eyepieces and instruments containing eyepieces; eye shades; prescription eye shades; eye shades having adjustable optical power lenses; sun visors; sunglasses; tinted eyeglasses; sunglasses having adjustable optical power lenses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2020 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 1, 2020 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |