USPTO serial 85923880
LU MINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LU MINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lachine, QC. H8T 1A3, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Baby bedding, namely, bundle bags, swaddling blankets, crib bumpers, fitted crib sheets, crib skirts, crib blankets, and diaper changing pad covers not of paper; Baby blankets; Bath gloves; Bath mitts; Bath sheets; Bath towels; Bed blankets; Bed pads; Bed sheets; Blanket throws; Blankets for outdoor use; Burp cloths; Children's blankets; Children's bed sheets, pillow cases, and blankets; Crib bumper pads; Crib bumpers; Crib sheets; Diaper changing pads not of paper; Face cloths; Insect protection nets for household purposes; Mattress pads; Mosquito nets; Pillow cases; Pillow covers; Pillow shams; Pillowcases; Sheet sets; Towel sheet; Travelling blankets; Unfitted fabric crib rail covers; Wash cloths | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
| 025 | Babies' pants; Baby bibs not of paper; Baby bodysuits; Baby bottoms; Baby bunting; Baby doll pyjamas; Baby layettes for clothing; Baby tops; Bath sandals; Bath slippers; Beach shoes; Belts for clothing; Canvas shoes; Children's and infant's apparel, namely, jumpers, overall sleepwear, pajamas, rompers and one-piece garments; Children's and infants' cloth bibs; Children's cloth eating bibs; Cloth bibs; Clothing, namely, neck tubes; Clothing, namely, wrap-arounds; Gloves; Gloves as clothing; Gloves for apparel; Hats for infants, babies, toddlers and children; Hosiery; Infant and toddler one piece clothing; Infant sleepers; Infant wearable blankets; Infants' shoes and boots; Leather slippers; Mittens; Outdoor mittens; Plastic baby bibs; Rain hats; Shirts for infants, babies, toddlers and children; Shoe accessories, namely, fitted decorative covers for shoes; Shoes; Short sets; Slipper socks; Slippers; Socks; Sports caps and hats; Swaddling clothes; Tennis shoes; Wearable blankets in the nature of blankets with sleeves; Wraps | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
| 028 | Articles of clothing for toys; Baby rattles; Baby rattles incorporating teething rings; Bath toys; Bathtub toys; Children's educational toys for developing fine motor, oral language, numbers, counting, colors and alphabet skills sold in a fabric bag which has a clear vinyl window for viewing small trinkets and toys securely contained within the bag itself; Children's multiple activity toys; Crib mobiles; Crib toys; Dolls and doll accessories, namely, clothing for dolls, doll rooms, doll beds, doll houses, toy fabrics and linens for dolls and strollers for dolls; Dolls for playing; Gift baskets containing plush toys; Infant action crib toys; Infant toys; Musical toys; Plush toys; Pull toys; Rubber character toys; Sand toys; Squeezable squeaking toys; Squeeze toys; Stacking toys; Stuffed and plush toys; Stuffed toy animals; Stuffed toys; Toy construction blocks; Toys, namely, bean bag animals | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2013 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |