USPTO serial 85924225
GREENGUARD RCY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREENGUARD RCY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KINGSCOURT, CO. CAVAN, IE
Lake Forest, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Reilly
PAUL J REILLY BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ STE 4340NEW YORK, NY 10112-4498UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Polystyrene foam insulation and sheathing used in the construction and repair of residential and commercial buildings, recreational vehicles and manufactured housing; polystyrene foam used as underlayments and air infiltration barriers in residential and commercial building construction and repair; polystyrene foam used to protect waterproofing membranes in subsurface construction; polystyrene foam used as a separator and cushioning sheet or recovery board in construction and repair of roofs; polyethylene foam used as gasketing material in the construction and repair of residential and commercial buildings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |