USPTO serial 85924620
AEROCHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AEROCHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Debra S. Serota
DEBRA S. SEROTA FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.PO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamins, minerals, nutritional supplements, dietary supplements, nutraceuticals, OTC pharmaceuticals, pharmaceuticals, oral health nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals, fluoride for oral health, breath fresheners, all in powder form sold with an aerosolizing device; vitamins, minerals, nutritional supplements, dietary supplements, nutraceuticals, OTC pharmaceuticals, pharmaceuticals, oral health nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals, fluoride for oral health, breath fresheners, all in powder form for use with an aerosolizing device; aerosolizing devices sold empty for use with vitamins, minerals, nutritional supplements, dietary supplements, nutraceuticals, OTC pharmaceuticals, pharmaceuticals, oral health nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals, fluoride for oral health, and breath fresheners, in powder form | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa-based beverages, chocolate and flavored chocolate, white chocolate, candy, spices, sugar, cookies, biscuits, pizza, bakery goods, milk products namely ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt, food flavorings (nonessential oils), coffee essences, and beverage flavorings, all in powder form contained in an aerosolizing delivery apparatus or in powder cartridge form for use with an aerosolizing delivery apparatus; aerosolized food products, namely a line of food and beverage products in powder form contained in an aerosolizing delivery apparatus or in powder cartridge form for use with an aerosolizing delivery apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |