Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 85925273?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/85925273. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns REVENUE MARKETING?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 85925273, the listed owner(s) include: The Pedowitz Group, LLC.

What is USPTO serial number 85925273?

Serial number 85925273 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark REVENUE MARKETING. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of REVENUE MARKETING?

REVENUE MARKETING (85925273) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover REVENUE MARKETING?

The public record lists International Classes: 035. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 85925273

REVENUE MARKETING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: May 7, 2013
Status date: Nov 9, 2017
Registration date: —
Examiner: REGAN, JOHN B
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REVENUE MARKETING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

The Pedowitz Group, LLC
Alpharetta, GA
Other trademarks owned by The Pedowitz Group, LLC

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen M. Schaetzel

STEPHEN M SCHAETZEL MEUNIER CARLIN & CURFMAN LLC999 PEACHTREE ST NESUITE 1300ATLANTA, GA 30309

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
035	Advertising and marketing consultancy	ACTIVE	Feb 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Nov 16, 2017	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Nov 9, 2017	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Nov 9, 2017	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Sep 25, 2017	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Jun 27, 2017	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jun 27, 2017	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jun 27, 2017	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jun 1, 2017	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 1, 2017	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 30, 2017	ERSI	TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED	—
Nov 30, 2016	GNS2	NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Nov 30, 2016	GNSI	INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Nov 30, 2016	CNSI	SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN	—
May 26, 2016	GNS3	NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
May 26, 2016	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
May 26, 2016	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
May 6, 2016	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Oct 30, 2015	GNS3	NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Oct 30, 2015	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Oct 30, 2015	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Sep 23, 2015	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jul 23, 2015	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 23, 2015	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 23, 2015	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jul 17, 2015	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 17, 2015	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 9, 2015	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jun 30, 2015	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Jun 30, 2015	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jun 30, 2015	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 30, 2015	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Apr 24, 2015	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Dec 30, 2014	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Dec 30, 2014	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2014	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 2014	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 8, 2014	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 8, 2014	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2014	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2014	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2014	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2014	NREV	NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED	—
Jun 3, 2014	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 2, 2014	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 2, 2014	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2014	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jun 2, 2014	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
May 29, 2014	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2014	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Apr 1, 2014	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2014	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2013	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2013	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2013	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2013	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 14, 2013	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
May 10, 2013	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—