USPTO serial 85925796
QUESTFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2014
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with QUESTFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Cook
Thomas W. Cook THOMAS COOK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEYSPO BOX 1989SAUSALITO, CA 94966-1989UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cloud computing featuring software and data, operable via servers, Internet protocol networks, and data storage and hosting infrastructure that makes resources available to subscribing business customers through a set of interfaces, namely, providing virtual computer systems through cloud computing, providing virtual computer environments through cloud computing, cloud hosting provider services, updating and maintaining cloud based computer software through patches and on-line updates, and technical consulting services in the field of private cloud computing solutions; Cloud computing using servers, Internet protocol networks, data storage and hosting infrastructure to businesses to manage platform components including runtime software execution stack, databases, and other middleware components interfaces for managing digital technology and data, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems, and providing technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture; cloud computing using servers, Internet protocol networks, data storage and hosting infrastructure to deploy, configure, maintain, and update software used in providing information technology services interfaces to businesses for managing digital technology and data, namely, computer programming services for others in the field of software configuration management and software development for others in the field of software configuration management; cloud computing via servers, Internet protocol networks, data storage and hosting infrastructure to provide services, namely, IAAS (Infrastructure-as-a-Service) featuring computer software platforms for creating, managing and deploying cloud computing infrastructure services, BsaaS (Business continuity-as-a-Service) featuring computer software platforms for data recovery, TaaS (Test-as-a-Service) featuring computer software platforms for testing computer hardware and computer software programs for others; VaaS (Video conferencing-as-a-Service) featuring computer software platforms for providing video conferencing services for others, SaaS (Security-as-a-Service) featuring computer software platforms for providing business data security functions for others, BaaS (Backup-as-a-Service) featuring computer software platforms for backing up business data stored in third party applications and on storage platforms; CaaS (Communications-as-a-Service) featuring computer software platforms for managing enterprise communications in the nature of telephony, messaging, conferencing, Internet telephone, VoIP; DaaS (Desktop-as-a-Service) featuring computer software platforms for developing virtual desktop environments including managing the back-end responsibilities of data storage, backup, security and upgrades, Iaas (Identity-as-a-Service) featuring computer software platforms for managing sign-on authentication, PaaS (Platform-as-a-Service) featuring computer software platforms for accessing rented hardware, operating systems, storage and network capacity over the Internet, SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) featuring computer software platforms for accessing software applications over the Internet, SaaS (Storage-as-a-Service) featuring computer software platforms for managing digital technology and data in digital storage; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; consulting services in the field of cloud computing; providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; technical consulting services in the fields of data center architecture, cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of Internet technology and services; technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of cloud computing IT and application systems; updating and maintaining cloud based computer software through on-line updates, enhancements and patches | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 7, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Quest Media & Supplies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Quest Media & Supplies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Quest Media & Supplies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named QUESTFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 14, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |