USPTO serial 85925914
THE CONNECTED SMART CARD COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CONNECTED SMART CARD COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin Kaminash
BENJAMIN KAMINASH KAMINASH & ASSOCIATES LLCPO BOX 3317PORTLAND, OR 97208-3317UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Flash memory cards, integrated smart card chips, and near field communication (NFC) chips that identify users using mobile communication devices and that facilitate payment transactions using mobile communication devices, and to otherwise facilitate mobile banking, mobile retail, mobile remittances, microfinance, and mobile identity management; Computer software, namely, preloaded application firmware on electronic memory cards to facilitate payment transactions using mobile communication devices, and to otherwise facilitate mobile banking, mobile retail, mobile remittances, microfinance, and mobile identity management; Computer software, namely, electronic financial platform and infrastructure software for credit card processors and intermediaries, financial institutions, and financial lenders that accommodates payment transactions from mobile communication devices, mobile banking, mobile retail, mobile remittances, microfinance, and mobile identity management and to otherwise support end-to-end security and over-the air personalization and provisioning in connection with said transactions and functions; Computer software, namely, security and identity management platform and infrastructure software for mobile communication devices, mobile banking, mobile retail, mobile remittances, microfinance, and mobile identity management and to otherwise support end-to-end security and over-the air personalization and provisioning in connection with said functions; Antennas for mobile communication devices to facilitate payment transactions using said devices, and to facilitate mobile banking, mobile retail, mobile remittances, microfinance, and mobile identity management; Booster apparatus that amplifies incoming electromagnetic signals for mobile communication devices to facilitate payment transactions using said devices, and to facilitate mobile banking, mobile retail, mobile remittances, microfinance, and mobile identity management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |