Drawing for P

USPTO serial 85926330

P

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with P?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robyn S. Lederman

Robyn S. Lederman BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CTR FL 22SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1183UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES RELATING TO DISTRIBUTION, STORAGE, MANAGEMENT, AND METERING OF POWER FOR ELECTRONICALLY AND BATTERY POWERED DEVICES; PROVIDING A WEB-BASED ON-LINE PORTAL THAT PROVIDES CUSTOMER ACCESS TO THEIR ACCOUNT INFORMATION; ADVERTISING, NAMELY, PROVIDING ADVERTISING SPACE VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ARRANGING SUBSCRIPTIONS TO WIRELESS POWER CHARGING SYSTEMS AND SERVICES FOR OTHERS; SUBSCRIPTIONS TO WIRELESS POWER CHARGING STATIONS; SUBSCRIPTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES AS A SUBSCRIPTION AGENT BETWEEN WIRELESS POWER PROVIDERS AND CUSTOMERS; ADMINISTRATION OF A CONSUMER MEMBERSHIP PROGRAM FOR ENABLING PARTICIPANTS TO RECEIVE ACCESS TO WIRELESS POWER CHARGING SYSTEMS; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH AN INDUCTIVE CHARGING SYSTEM THROUGH A NETWORK OF BATTERY POWER CHARGING STATIONS WHERE ADS WILL APPEAR ON MOBILE DEVICES WHEN SUCH STATIONS ARE ACTIVATED BY END USERSACTIVE—
037CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF BATTERY POWER CHARGING SYSTEMSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 10, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 8, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 19, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 8, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 8, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 29, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 29, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 29, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 18, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 11, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 14, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 11, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance