USPTO serial 85926490
DITTYME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DITTYME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent A. Friedman
BRENT A. FRIEDMAN BRENT A. FRIEDMAN, PA100 SE 2ND ST STE 2950MIAMI, FL 33131-2101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for processing digital music files; Computer software for wireless content delivery; Computer software for transmitting music through text messages sent and delivered between hand held mobile devices and/or computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communications by means of mobile phones; Data communication by electronic mail; Delivery of digital music by electronic transmission; Delivery of messages by electronic transmission; Electronic mail; Electronic mail and messaging services; Electronic mail services for data and voice; Electronic mail services for sending music with an integrated text or email message for delivery to a recipient; Electronic message sending; Electronic message transmission; Electronic transmission and streaming of digital media content for others via global and local computer networks; Electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; Electronic transmission of voice, data and images by television and video broadcasting; Message sending, receiving and forwarding; Mobile media services in the nature of electronic transmission of entertainment media content; Provision of voice short message services (VSMS); Streaming of audio material on the Internet; Streaming of music through text or email messages and related material on the Internet; Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the Internet; Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, sound and video by means of broadband power line or wireless networks; Telecommunications by e-mail; Text and numeric wireless digital messaging services; Transmission of sound, picture and data signals; Transmission of sound, video and information; Wireless digital messaging services; Wireless electronic transmission of voice signals, data, facsimiles, images and information; Wireless electronic transmission of short snippets of music with a wrritten text or email | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |